Turbo m52 obd2
-
-
where are you going to put those gauges?
I like them up top because they are easy to see, but most likely I will be cutting out the sunglass holder move the obc down and move the radio where the obc used to be and put the gauges where the radio use to be. If that makes sense.
-
Me I'm using kwp2000 to tune the stock ecu.
Im probably going to switch to MS3
It just takes way to long to make tiny adjustments.
Awesome! What maf are you using? And cant you simply do partial flashes instead of sending an entire file?
sk8 or die
-
Stock maf which is good up to 400 hp.
With the software I'm using you have to pull all the info off the ecu.
If there is a better way please guide me to the land of 1000hp lol
Its obdII and as far as I know rk tunes is the only people who will tune it, at a price of 1500 dollars. Which is a rip off, I'd rather put my money elsewhere.
This is just something fun to drive around town.
-
Well the HPX maf would be my next switch, along with e85. Tune it yourself! its a lot of fun. But I swear I read online about partial flashes with obd2. You are using romraider correct?
Odb1 tuning is very easy and much cheaper, but in your boat I would go MS3 if you aren't happy with the stock ecu. SOOO much easier.
sk8 or die
-
Changed some things up on the car.
Had it dynoed at late model throttle.
It was with a spare ecu with no revisions stock injectors and fmu
The numbers were right where I hoped they would be.
It was 4th gear pull at 8 psi, the second run was right after so it was pretty hot.
sorry I didn't save the semen sample to put on the sheet
-
Here I was thinking those numbers seem really low.
That's about 60hp and 50 ft/lb more than stock (taking both from crank hp), assuming on the low side we have 10% drive train loss.
I guess it's not that terrible now that I type that out. -
I bought and built the car for 2,500 dollars, I didn't have a boost controller installed otherwise mb could've hit 300
185hp is the highest stock I've seen so an extra 60hp plus cool turbo noises. I'm sure I'll be back once I do a legit tune, with much higher numbers.
-
Here I was thinking those numbers seem really low.
That's about 60hp and 50 ft/lb more than stock (taking both from crank hp), assuming on the low side we have 10% drive train loss.
I guess it's not that terrible now that I type that out.To get an extra 50 hp out of a m52 n/a you would have to do cams intake headers chip m50 manifold and I still don't think you would be there.
-
To get an extra 50 hp out of a m52 n/a you would have to do cams intake headers chip m50 manifold and I still don't think you would be there.
With that combo you're looking at 220whp-ish. Your numbers look good for being on a budget!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login