Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
WIBIMMERS logo

WIBIMMERS

  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Members BMWs
  4. new to me, 98 M3

new to me, 98 M3

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Members BMWs
173 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • m42b32M
    m42b32M
    m42b32
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Snap said:

    ****PROBLEM MAF is showing a flowrate of 0.01 lb/sec. my math says that 0.15 lb/min should be roughly 2hp. At idle your engine should be creating at least 15-20hp.   So your MAF is borked, your wiring has an issue, or there is a SEVERE air leak somewhere.

    Throttle Position is at 17% which tells me that you have to keep your foot on the throttle a bit at idle to keep it alive because of the presumed MAF problem.

    At idle with my foot off the gas my '99 M3 sits at 17%/18% throttle. Not sure on the rest of the numbers though. When I get back from my trip I can see what my car reads for the rest of the parameters you posted to compare

    1991 318is, 1991 318i, 2022 Bronco

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C
      C
      cpandrewschmidt
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      hi all, back from the weekend.  Update.  Hooked up a DIY smoker.  Paint can with some tubes hooked up to a compressor at 4 psi then blew smoke into the chamber.  Worked well except I couldn't introduce enough smoke with just a cigar.  Didn't really need the smoke I was able to hear one small leak out of one of the SC tubes.  Fixed that and checked again couldnt hear any air leaking out of anywhere else and pressure definitely built up.  Intake tube fix held fine.  Drove car again and light still came on, this time only code P1188.  

      Filter is a K&N that probably needs to be cleaned and lightly oiled again.  But not sure that would be my problem.  Next step is to check injectors I suppose.  I put some injector cleaner in the tank.  Also tried to clean MAF.  For the O2 sensors I only unplugged 1 at a time so I know I put those back in the correct spots.

      Car still seems to run just fine, drove it about 250 round trip up north.  who knows on this one!  Kind of stumped at this point.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C
        C
        cpandrewschmidt
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        Did a little more testing on the code reader.  For my MAF reading i watched it while driving home.  At 55 mph it would hover between .04-.05 lb/s  Not sure if that's normal or low.  Under reasonably heavy acceleration it'd get to .11 lb/s.  So, it appears to at least be reading something.  I unplugged it at idle and the car started to spit and sputter badly, so it's regulating a little bit I assume.  Would software for the SC mess with this?  No one on here around Madison I could swing by to test a known good MAF before dropping a couple hundred on one?  I'll also be around brookfield this Friday about 2pm and heading back to Madison 😄  

        I tried the screw driver on the injector trick to see if they're ticking properly.  Couldn't really hear crap over regular engine noise.  You'd think they'd be OK since they're only 20K miles old when the SC was put on.  Haven't flow tested them yet.  I suppose that's next. 

        Happy to entertain other ideas!  New fuel filter comes Friday as well, maybe its not getting the fuel it needs?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D
          D
          Daggerty
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          What's the part number on your maf, I might have one.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C
            C
            cpandrewschmidt
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            Daggerty said:

            What's the part number on your maf, I might have one.

            Real OEM is saying 

            13621703275

            but I'll double check what's actually on mine since the SC kit supposedly came with a new one. 

            Another note, I see my reading is .01 lb/s. I'm looking online for normal readings and see readings are all recorded in lb/hr.  Not sure if that makes my reading OK.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B
              B
              B C
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              thanks for pointing that out, lb/min is the most frequently used unit for engine airflow (besides CFM) and I totally overlooked the fact that your scanner outputs lb/sec.  .05 lb/sec is roughly 30hp which is reasonable for cruising.  "reasonably heavy acceleration" at .11 lb/sec is only 60hp which is only considered reasonably heavy acceleration in an air-cooled beetle.

              if you can get a WOT reading and give an approximate RPM  during the reading we can get a better gauge as to whether the MAF reading is reasonably or not. So far it appears reasonable at low throttle openings  but not heavy acceleration.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C
                C
                cpandrewschmidt
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                thanks SNAP, i'll do that today!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C
                  C
                  cpandrewschmidt
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  OK, took out for lunch.  A bit hard to read while driving and going to WOT but I noticed it as high as 24.1 lb/s.  If I had to guess my rpm around 4500-5000 range at that point.  Again hard to drive and not crash while watching three things.  So, it may have peaked higher I just didn't catch it.  I also took some revised data while cruising at 55 mph.  Not sure if that tells anymore of a story.  

                  One other little thing I've noticed.  When I come off throttle and into neutral from stop and go traffic the rpm will dip very briefly to about 400 rpm and recover immediately to normal idle. Only does this in stop/go.  Doesn't do it if I come into neutral from higher gears like 4 and 5 and drop into neutral.  

                  201703091139021489090292871resized.jpg

                  201703091139171489090290337resized.jpg

                  201703091139271489090286970resized.jpg

                  201703091139341489090284614resized.jpg

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B
                    B
                    B C
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    24.1 lb/sec is an absurd value which equates to 14,500 HP

                    24.1 lb/min is a very realistic value which equates to 240 HP

                    You should be seeing 0.35-0.40 lb/sec at WOT for that rpm.

                    rpm dip upon return to idle means the engine isn't idling efficiently. Most of the time this means a vacuum leak. Sometimes it means check your idle control valve, clean it and inspect the plumbing on it and make sure it works.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C
                      C
                      cpandrewschmidt
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      Yeah, my car is really fast! 😉  sorry meant .24   I'll take a passenger with me who can watch more closely to see if it gets up towards .35

                      I'll keep searching for vac leaks.  Going to have get it up on ramps.  Because of the SC the ICV is located under the SC and very hard to get at.  I was hoping in the back of my mind i wouldn't have to deal with that, but am realizing I'm probably going to need to inspect it.  Not sure how i'm going to get at it.  ugh......

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D
                        D
                        Daggerty
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        It looks like it has a 3.5inch maf housing, see if it has a filament or chip maf I have both. I also have a spare icv

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • m42b32M
                          m42b32M
                          m42b32
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          Ok, finally got some time to pull a bunch of numbers from my car. It was not fully warmed up, but idling around 750rpm. 

                          Absolute throttle position: 18.8%

                          Voltage: 14.00

                          B1S1 O2 voltage: 0.125 (bounced between this and 0.950, probably an issue with my reader)

                          B1S2 O2 voltage: 0.960

                          B2S1 O2 voltage: 0.115 (bounced between this and 0.950, probably an issue with my reader)

                          B2S2 O2 voltage: 0.940

                          Short term fuel trim 1: Between -2.4 and 0.8

                          Long term fuel trim 1: 2.34

                          Short term fuel trim 2: Between -.8 and 2.4

                          Long term fuel trim 2: 1.56

                          Timing advance: between 15 and 17.5

                          Mass airflow 1 (g/s): Between 3.57 and 3.85

                          Mass airflow 2 (g/s): Between 3.43 and 4.9 (4.9 was just after startup, rpm's not fully settled)

                          Hopefully this helps!

                          1991 318is, 1991 318i, 2022 Bronco

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C
                            C
                            cpandrewschmidt
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            Thanks M42B32.  I've discovered I have the 803 Porsche MAF because of the supercharger and upgraded injectors.  So, not sure my numbers will give much of a comparison.  I'd say the MAF appears to be functioning though.  That would have also been new at the time of SC install.  

                            I haven't had a chance to drive much since this weekend.  Summer tires on the M and snow don't mix.  Hopefully tomorrow I'll be able to get it out of the subdivision.  Spent the weekend tearing down to the ICV.  Cleaned that real well, it was pretty dirty.  Put everything back together real tight, added hose clamps to vacuum lines that didn't have any just to be safe.  Not hearing any leaks.  Cleaned the air filter.  It was filthy.  Still getting crap out of it after using the K&N cleaner three times.  Cleared codes and only took for a couple short trips.  Pending codes didn't come back.  Not holding my breath though, codes seemed to appear when I'd get to highway speeds, which I didn't do yet.  Tomorrow should be a good test.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B
                              B
                              B C
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #38

                              Does your chip tune account fort the different MAF?/did this MAF and chip tune come from the vendor that sells the SC kit?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C
                                C
                                cpandrewschmidt
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #39

                                Snap said:

                                Does your chip tune account fort the different MAF?/did this MAF and chip tune come from the vendor that sells the SC kit?

                                according to the website yes

                                http://www.eurosporthighperformance.com/supercharger.html

                                also, car was running fine with no CEL for about 500 miles when I got it, so hopefully tune is good.  TRM Tuning in Cummings, GA did the install work.  Apparently they're reputable and they did respond to me that they worked on this car, so i know that's true.  Keeping fingers crossed it was a vacuum leaked.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C
                                  C
                                  cpandrewschmidt
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #40

                                  ok, code still there.  Update on some numbers I noticed while driving today.  

                                  Seems my short term fuel trim 1 is out of wack.  It stays around -18-20% while in gears 1-3 when going upto 4-5th gears at highway speeds it drops to -10.6-12% which still seems like a high number compared to SHRTFT2 which stays in the -3-6% range.  Long term still holds steady at -8.6% for both.  

                                  Thoughts if that might still point to a vacuum leak or fuel delivery issue?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • damnboy037D
                                    damnboy037D
                                    damnboy037
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #41

                                    Maybe the coolant pump or lines?

                                    99 M3 320rwhp @ 6psi

                                    95 M3 s50b32

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • patsbimmer1P
                                      patsbimmer1P
                                      patsbimmer1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #42

                                      Your STFT is an instant reading of fuel being used and should remain similar across both banks.  If you have one bank out of wack then that bank may have an issue.  Running that far negative would point towards an over fueling issue and the ecu is trying to pull fuel away but you want to evaluate the numbers at idle and at 2500 rpm.  Leaky injector, bad maf, bad 02, those are a few items that could cause this.

                                      2011 e90 M3 - DCT, Borla exhaust, BMW Performance Black Grille, ECS Painted Corners, Ziza Angel Eyes

                                      07 335i Stella - sport package, BMS DCI, zhp knob, TMS cf parking brake lever, VRSF downpipes, MHD tune, H&R race springs, other stuff *SOLD*

                                      97 328i Lola - sport package, m50 intake manifold, m50 manifold.com install kit, custom CAI, K&N filter, Borla exhaust, FK silverline coilovers, 25.5mm front sway bar, Powerflex front sway bushings, Turner Radiator, fan delete *sold*
                                      95 325is *sold*
                                      93 nissan 240sx KA-T *sold*

                                      BMWCCA #473306

                                      Instagram @patsbimmer1

                                      AKA- HALLWAY PAT

                                      "burnouts bring babes and babes dont have time for bushings" - Kaiser Rolls

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C
                                        C
                                        cpandrewschmidt
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #43

                                        Morning all, no fun updates, rims will go on next week so I'll get pics up when that's done!

                                        Still working on this dang CEL.  No vacuum leaks, changed fuel filter as well.  I rented a fuel pressure test gauge from Orileys to make sure I'm not getting low pressure.  Here's what happened. T'd it into the fuel line at the fuel pump in the back seat.  Turned pump on and no reading on the gauge.  Perhaps fuel isn't going through?  So, I start the car and car starts right up and runs, but still no reading on the gauge.  OK, well maybe it's just a bad gauge.  So, we return that one and get a second one from Autozone.  Hook that one up, same thing.  No pressure on gauge but pump is clearly working and fuel it flowing through the "T" connection because car runs fine.  We could be idiots and hooked it up wrong, but I don't really see how that would be possible, you just put the "T" fitting inline and connect the gauge.  Two gauges wouldn't both be bad you wouldn't think.  

                                        So, maybe this means something, I'm not getting enough back pressure to register on the gauge?  Fuel pressure regulator?  If that is shot wouldn't I be running rich?  I thought having the negative short term fuel % mean that I was running lean.  Or does that reading mean I'm actually running rich and the computer is trying to Lean out the fuel?  That might make sense then if the FPR is shot. 

                                        Thanks again for all the help, Andrew

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B
                                          B
                                          B C
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #44

                                          Pull the vac line off the FPR and see if it has fuel in it. Easy way to check if it is leaking internally.

                                          Is it possible that you tee'd into the return line instead of the feed line?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups