<![CDATA[I want.]]>I know most of you guys here think anything newer than 1978 is seriously uncool.  But this rocks in so many different ways:

http://performancedrive.com.au/1970s-bmw-e9-cs-gets-e39-m5-v8-conversion-2815/

]]>https://wibimmers.com/topic/3476/i-want.RSS for NodeWed, 16 Sep 2026 05:46:54 GMTThu, 29 Jan 2015 16:09:19 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:12:16 GMT]]>bump for the best looking coupe bmw has ever made!

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/54784https://wibimmers.com/post/54784Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:12:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Sat, 31 Jan 2015 07:01:56 GMT]]>I wasn't against it until I saw the dashboard. The rounded plastic interiors of the 90s are one of the worst automotive legacies that decade left behind IMO. I've always been a fan of clean, minimalist design though, so I'm a little biased.

frankenclassic-4.jpg?1393046513

bmw-e9-interior-2.jpg

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53581https://wibimmers.com/post/53581Sat, 31 Jan 2015 07:01:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:14:26 GMT]]>And, now I like it more:

http://www.bimmer-mag.com/issues/116/articles/frankenclassic?page=1#.VMrMwPldV8E

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53522https://wibimmers.com/post/53522Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:14:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:00:20 GMT]]>No, you misread my first sentence.  I feel most of the people here don't like new cars, 79+ being considered new.  So I posted a car that was definitely not new, but it had a new(er) drivetrain which I personally adore. 

Oh, and lol.

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53494https://wibimmers.com/post/53494Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:00:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:36:31 GMT]]>

CMart said:

Nope. Thought about it, but it's mint and I don't want someone running into it.

I was thinking about using the 4x4 F250, but I may be traveling for work.

running into it at the dragstrip.

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53493https://wibimmers.com/post/53493Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:36:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:11:43 GMT]]>Posting the answer before the question.

I see what you did there. 

tumblrnf06odfnfB1sjaxuao1400.jpg

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53489https://wibimmers.com/post/53489Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:11:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:02:08 GMT]]>Nope. Thought about it, but it's mint and I don't want someone running into it.

I was thinking about using the 4x4 F250, but I may be traveling for work.

michael1972 said:

Hey Cmart you going to bring the CTS-V to the GLD thing this spring?

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53486https://wibimmers.com/post/53486Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:02:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:54:50 GMT]]>YES!!

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53482https://wibimmers.com/post/53482Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:54:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:39:51 GMT]]>E92's are the way way bitchinest

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53477https://wibimmers.com/post/53477Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:39:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:20:26 GMT]]>E9s are the bitchinest

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53472https://wibimmers.com/post/53472Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:20:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:03:30 GMT]]>Hey Cmart you going to bring the CTS-V to the GLD thing this spring?

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53470https://wibimmers.com/post/53470Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:03:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:45:44 GMT]]>He was saying most people don't like old cars. I was saying I don't consider that specific example an 'old car'.

That said I think the E9 CS is an absolutely stunning car and would love to pick one up. They won't be getting any cheaper.

michael1972 said:

Ok now I am confused. It is pre 78' because it's a 1970 but that makes it older then 1978 witch makes the original statement of newer then 1978 incorrect. It is what it is.

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53469https://wibimmers.com/post/53469Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:45:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:39:22 GMT]]>Ok now I am confused. It is pre 78' because it's a 1970 but that makes it older then 1978 witch makes the original statement of newer then 1978 incorrect. It is what it is.

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53468https://wibimmers.com/post/53468Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:39:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:43:43 GMT]]>How do you consider that pre 1978?

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53465https://wibimmers.com/post/53465Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:43:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I want. on Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:42:45 GMT]]>Yessir

]]>https://wibimmers.com/post/53464https://wibimmers.com/post/53464Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:42:45 GMT